Google touts YouTube anti-piracy moves, critics remain critical
Google says its Content ID copyright management system is working and helping "creators" monetize their content.

Google is a long-standing target of critics who claim that the
company “encourages piracy.” While this is not a uniformly held view,
and Google vehemently disputes it, the accusation has been voiced by
many in the
music and
motion picture industries.
Over time, Google has implemented various systems and methodologies
to try to address piracy and copyright infringement on YouTube and in
search results, in part to satisfy critics and in part to satisfy the
law. (YouTube’s founders initially turned a blind eye toward copyright
infringement.)
Earlier this week, the company released a report called “How Google
Fights Piracy” (embedded below). It also discussed those efforts in a
blog post.
In the report’s introduction, the company says:
The internet continues to be a boon for creators, their
communities, and the content industry, and Google continues to be a key
part of that success. Today, Google’s services provide more content for
users, generate more revenue for rightsholders, and do more to battle
copyright-infringing activity than ever before. Google takes the
challenge of online piracy seriously—we continue to invest significant
resources in the development of tools to report and manage copyrighted
content, and we work with other industry leaders to set the standard for
how tech companies fight piracy.
The current mechanism of copyright enforcement and content management
on YouTube is called ContendID. Google says that it has invested “more
than $60 million” in the proprietary system. Google adds that “well over
90 percent [of content creators choose] to monetize videos containing
their copyrighted material.” Accordingly, Google asserts that “Content
ID on YouTube has generated over $2 billion for creators.”
There are still vocal critics in the Music Industry, for example, who don’t believe this is sufficient. According to a
piece in Billboard,
“Music stakeholders counter that… returns from the platform are
untenable, and that YouTube draws ears and eyes away from subscription
services like Spotify, which pay a much higher return for access to the
same music.”
In a related story, Google has
ended its bitter legal dispute
with Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, who had been aggressively
investigating piracy on Google for several years. Google sued Hood,
arguing
that the attorney general’s investigation was actually a front for the
financial interests of the Motion Picture Association of America. News
organizations at the time discovered what amounted to collusion or a
conspiracy to use the office of the Mississippi Attorney General to
enforce
SOPA-like control over internet content.
The case has now been settled, with both parties pledging cooperation
in the future. Though the settlement marks the end of the Hood
investigation, it certainly won’t mean the end of criticisms of Google’s
copyright enforcement policies and practices.